From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Time to do our Triage for 9.4 |
Date: | 2014-01-10 23:29:27 |
Message-ID: | 52D08257.7070007@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/10/2014 01:34 PM, David Rowley wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 8:28 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> To make this easier for everyone to participate in, I've created a wiki
>> page:
>>
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/9.4CF4Triage
>>
>> Please add the patches you know well to the appropriate list, thanks!
>>
>>
> I know my own patch pretty well and from my own point of view it's very
> close to being about ready to go, but a good review may change that. Should
> we be waiting for 2nd opinions or can patch authors decide for themselves?
> Or were you talking only to commiters?
Well, I'd prefer that someone other than the patch author assess the
patch state; the author is going to be characteristically optimistic.
However, it's a wiki. If you put it under "good to go" someone else who
disagrees can move it. IMHO, if the patch hasn't had at least one
review yet (in a prior CF), though, I'd put it under "Nearly Ready".
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2014-01-10 23:38:08 | Re: Standalone synchronous master |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-01-10 23:27:10 | Re: Standalone synchronous master |