| From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Disallow arrays with non-standard lower bounds |
| Date: | 2014-01-10 21:26:04 |
| Message-ID: | 52D0656C.60702@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/9/14, 10:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> writes:
>> ISTM that allowing users to pick arbitrary lower array bounds was a huge mistake. I've never seen anyone make use of it, can't think of any legitimate use cases for it, and hate the stupendous amount of extra code needed to deal with it.
>
> You lack imagination, sir.
Considering what you'd normally want to do in SQL, the only example I can think of is to not have the argument over 0 vs 1 based.
Actually, I was thinking there might be some computational problems where changing lower bound would be nice, but then again, what other languages actually support this?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2014-01-10 21:27:49 | Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-01-10 21:25:13 | Re: INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY LOCK FOR UPDATE |