| From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: nested hstore patch |
| Date: | 2014-01-09 01:03:27 |
| Message-ID: | 52CDF55F.40700@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/23/13, 9:47 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Has anybody looked into how hard it would be to add "method" notation
> to postgreSQL, so that instead of calling
>
> getString(hstorevalue, n)
>
> we could use
>
> hstorevalue.getString(n)
>
>
> yes, I played with it some years ago. I ended early, there was a problem with parser - when I tried append a new rule. And because there was not simple solution, I didn't continue.
>
> But it can be nice feature - minimally for plpgsql coders.
Isn't there also some major problem with differentiating between schema/table/field with that too? I recall discussion along those lines, though maybe it was for the idea of recursive schemas.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2014-01-09 01:38:39 | Re: Simple improvements to freespace allocation |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2014-01-09 01:01:21 | Re: Standalone synchronous master |