Re: Format of Pioint datatype.... lat/long or long/lat??

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: peterlen <peteralen(at)earthlink(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Format of Pioint datatype.... lat/long or long/lat??
Date: 2013-12-31 21:06:55
Message-ID: 52C331EF.2030006@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 12/31/2013 12:45 PM, peterlen wrote:
> PostgreSQL has a geometric data type of "point". The format is listed as (x,
> y) but I am not sure if the X is to represent latitude or longitude. I have
> seen different systems that us X for either. Typically, coordinates should
> be read as lat/long but I have seen the opposite as well. An example in the
> help docs listed a point coordinate as x= longitude and y=latitude. Can
> someone clarify what the postgres standard is? What this will come down to
> is how built-in geospatial functions will interpret the point value.

Well the point data type is just that a point with x, y coordinates. The
concept of longitude and latitude are higher order defined other systems
that use the point type as a building block, i.e. Postgis. So which help
docs did you see the x= longitude and y=latitude statement?

>
> Thanks - Peter
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Format-of-Pioint-datatype-lat-long-or-long-lat-tp5784939.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2013-12-31 21:09:54 Re: Format of Pioint datatype.... lat/long or long/lat??
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2013-12-31 20:57:20 Re: pg_upgrade & tablespaces