Re: repmgr updated to version 2.0~beta2-2.pgdg+1

Il 30/12/13 23:16, Christoph Berg ha scritto:
> Re: To PostgreSQL in Debian 2013-12-30 <20131230195605(dot)GB16147(at)msgid(dot)df7cb(dot)de>
>> Re: To PostgreSQL in Debian 2013-12-30 <E1Vxgh5-0003Bo-B7(at)atalia(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
>>> The package repmgr was updated on apt.postgresql.org:
>>>
>>> New version 2.0~beta2-2.pgdg+1:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> there seems to be a problem with postgresql-x.y-repmgr where x.y is
>> < 9.3. The repmgr_funcs.so in there are linked to postgresql-9.3
>> instead of x.y.
>
> Hi Marco,
>
> I've just added a testsuite to repmgr that uses the functions from
> repmgr_funcs so it will detect this problem.
>
> https://pgdgbuild.dus.dg-i.net/jenkins/job/repmgr-binaries/architecture=amd64,distribution=sid/11/console
>
> 23:13:28 ERROR: incompatible library "/usr/lib/postgresql/9.0/lib/repmgr_funcs.so": version mismatch
> 23:13:28 DETAIL: Server is version 9.0, library is version 9.3.
> 23:13:28 STATEMENT: /*
> 23:13:28 * repmgr_function.sql
> 23:13:28 * Copyright (c) 2ndQuadrant, 2010
> 23:13:28 *
> 23:13:28 */
> 23:13:28
> 23:13:28 CREATE FUNCTION repmgr_update_standby_location(text) RETURNS boolean
> 23:13:28 AS '$libdir/repmgr_funcs', 'repmgr_update_standby_location'
> 23:13:28 LANGUAGE C STRICT;
>
> In the long run, there should probably more tests (tbh I didn't check
> if there is already a test suite, is there one?), but for now, that
> should be enough.

Thanks for your help. I'll fix it ASAP.

Regards,
Marco

--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| Marco Nenciarini | Debian/GNU Linux Developer - Plug Member |
| mnencia(at)prato(dot)linux(dot)it | http://www.prato.linux.it/~mnencia |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key fingerprint = FED9 69C7 9E67 21F5 7D95 5270 6864 730D F095 E5E4