Re: Proposal: variant of regclass

From: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com, pavel(at)microolap(dot)com, andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: Proposal: variant of regclass
Date: 2013-12-31 03:03:03
Message-ID: 52C233E7.7010905@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/31/2013 02:38 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Before proceeding the work, I would like to make sure that followings
> are complete list of new functions. Inside parentheses are
> corresponding original functions.
>
> toregproc (regproc)
> toregoper (regoper)
> toregclass (regclass)
> toregtype (regtype)

Pardon the bikeshedding, but those are hard to read for me. I would
prefer to go with the to_timestamp() model and add an underscore to
those names.

--
Vik

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-12-31 03:59:14 Re: truncating pg_multixact/members
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2013-12-31 01:41:32 Re: PoC: Partial sort