From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why no INSTEAD OF triggers on tables? |
Date: | 2013-12-17 17:42:44 |
Message-ID: | 52B08D14.8080100@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/16/2013 07:53 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> So, put a BEFORE trigger, and make it return NULL. Same effect,
> different notation.
NOT the same:
Master partition table with BEFORE trigger:
josh=# insert into a ( id, val ) values ( 23, 'test' ), ( 24, 'test'),
(25,'test');
INSERT 0 0
^^^
View with INSTEAD OF trigger:
josh=# insert into a_v ( id, val ) values ( 23, 'test' ), ( 24, 'test'),
(25,'test');
INSERT 0 3
^^^
The difference here is that the INSTEAD OF trigger returns a
rows-affected count, and the BEFORE trigger does not (it returns 0).
Some drivers and ORMs, most notably Hibernate, check this rows-returned
count, and error if they don't match the rows sent.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Weber | 2013-12-17 17:46:57 | Re: patch: make_timestamp function |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-12-17 17:40:59 | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |