| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Completing PL support for Event Triggers |
| Date: | 2013-12-11 18:49:43 |
| Message-ID: | 52A8B3C7.6000808@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/11/13, 5:06 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> I think you are mistaken. My patch includes all changes between your v1
>> and v2 patch.
>
> I mistakenly remembered that we did remove all the is_event_trigger
> business from the plperl patch too, when it's not the case. Sorry about
> this confusion.
>
> My vote is for “ready for commit” then.
PL/Perl was committed.
Please update the commit fest entry with your plans about PL/Python.
(Returned with Feedback or move to next CF or close and create a
separate entry?)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-12-11 18:51:51 | Re: stats for network traffic WIP |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-12-11 18:49:00 | Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |