Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Date: 2013-12-10 19:54:57
Message-ID: 52A77191.6010907@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/10/2013 11:49 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't think that anyone believes that not doing block sampling is
> tenable, fwiw. Clearly some type of block sampling would be preferable
> for most or all purposes.

As discussed, we need math though. Does anyone have an ACM subscription
and time to do a search? Someone must. We can buy one with community
funds, but no reason to do so if we don't have to.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2013-12-10 19:59:29 Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-12-10 19:54:43 Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good