| From: | Thomas Harold <thomas-lists(at)nybeta(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG replication across DataCenters (section 25 in the manual) |
| Date: | 2013-12-09 16:39:20 |
| Message-ID: | 52A5F238.2010603@nybeta.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
On 12/9/2013 11:24 AM, Ben Chobot wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity what did you find unclear about
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/different-replication-solutions.html?
Perhaps the "Per-table granularity" line in the matrix (Table 25-1)
might be better written as:
"Synchronization Granularity"
Columns 1-3 and 5 could say "Entire Cluster". Column 4 might say
"Selected tables (Slony)", and I'm not sure off-hand what granularity #6
(Bucardo) is capable of. Column #7 might just say "Varies".
For someone not familiar with what exactly WAL files are, it's not clear
that solution #3 is an all-or-nothing approaches at the cluster level.
Now that I've refreshed my memory on how WAL files work (and at what
level in the pgsql cluster), I understand why #3 works the way it does.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-12-09 21:13:30 | Re: pgcrypto docs |
| Previous Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2013-12-09 16:38:21 | Re: PG replication across DataCenters |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2013-12-09 17:39:52 | Re: network protocol and compatibility question |
| Previous Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2013-12-09 16:38:21 | Re: PG replication across DataCenters |