commit fest 2013-11 week 3 report

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: commit fest 2013-11 week 3 report
Date: 2013-12-06 16:14:14
Message-ID: 52A1F7D6.4080300@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Last week's status:

Fri Nov 29

Status Summary. Needs Review: 29, Waiting on Author: 33, Ready for
Committer: 13, Committed: 24, Returned with Feedback: 5, Rejected: 5.
Total: 109.

Current status:

Fri Dec 6 10:55

Status Summary. Needs Review: 24, Waiting on Author: 21, Ready for
Committer: 14, Committed: 26, Returned with Feedback: 16, Rejected: 8.
Total: 109.

Although this looks like slow progress on paper, many larger patches
have actually made significant progress in their reviews this past week.
A lot of those will probably be in very good shape for the next commit
fest.

We're also very close to achieving the primary goal of having given
every submission a decent review. Although it looks like Heikki's
B-tree patches might end up being the loser ...

Now it's crunch time:

- If you are a committer, grab a patch from the Ready for Committer list
and commit it.

- If you are a patch author and you hope to get your patch finished next
week, make sure you have a current patch, your commit fest entry is up
to date, and your reviewers are aware of your intentions.

- If you are a reviewer, grab one of the remaining patches and give it a
look. So no one feels sad.

- If you are a commit fest manager, all patches not in the above
categories should be disposed of appropriately by the end of next week.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-12-06 16:18:48 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-12-06 16:10:27 Re: pg_archivecleanup bug