Re: RFC: programmable file format for postgresql.conf

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)nosys(dot)es>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: programmable file format for postgresql.conf
Date: 2013-12-04 19:44:43
Message-ID: 529F862B.2040706@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/4/13, 2:02 PM, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa wrote:
> So optional fields are either purely optional (i.e., only for tools
> that want to use them; everyone else may ignore, but preserve, them) and
> some other are just NULLABLEs, depending on the parameter).

But my point stands: If it's optional, you can't rely on it, if it's
required, people will object because they don't more junk in their
config file.

But I think this is solving the wrong problem. The metadata is already
available via postgres --describe-config.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-04 19:54:34 Re: Extension Templates S03E11
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-12-04 19:43:52 Re: pgsql: Fix a couple of bugs in MultiXactId freezing