Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Date: 2013-12-04 15:30:51
Message-ID: 529F4AAB.80505@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/4/13, 2:14 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> running a
> few kvm instances that get bootstrapped automatically is something that
> is a solved problem.

Is it sound to run performance tests on kvm?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2013-12-04 15:32:41 Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2013-12-04 15:29:23 Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)