Re: Improvement of pg_stat_statement usage about buffer hit ratio

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Haribabu kommi <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improvement of pg_stat_statement usage about buffer hit ratio
Date: 2013-12-02 21:42:07
Message-ID: 529CFEAF.90901@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/19/13, 11:30 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>>> +1 from me.
>> >
>> >
>> > That's +1 for *not* including this?
> Right.

I agree with not including this.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-12-02 21:49:25 Re: Trust intermediate CA for client certificates
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-12-02 21:38:07 Re: Trust intermediate CA for client certificates