| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig James <cjames(at)emolecules(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine |
| Date: | 2013-11-26 15:31:32 |
| Message-ID: | 5294BED4.7080409@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 11/26/2013 09:26 AM, Craig James wrote:
>
> On 25.11.2013 22:01, Lee Nguyen wrote:
>
>
> Why shouldn't we run Postgres in a VM? What are the
> downsides? Does anyone
> have any metrics or benchmarks with the latest Postgres?
>
>
> For those of us with small (a few to a dozen servers), we'd like to
> get out of server maintenance completely. Can anyone with experience
> on a cloud VM solution comment? Do the VM solutions provided by the
> major hosting companies have the same good performance as the VM's
> that that several have described here?
>
> Obviously there's Amazon's new Postgres solution available. What else
> is out there in the way of "instant on" solutions with
> Linux/Postgres/Apache preconfigured systems? Has anyone used them in
> production?
>
>
If you want a full stack including Postgres, Heroku might be your best
bet. Depends a bit on your application and your workload. And yes, I've
used it. Full disclosure: I have done work paid for by Heroku.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-11-26 15:39:48 | Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine |
| Previous Message | Craig James | 2013-11-26 14:26:10 | Re: Postgresql in a Virtual Machine |