Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?
Date: 2000-05-05 05:32:17
Message-ID: 5294.957504737@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I griped about that a week or so ago, but no one seems to have picked up
>> on it. Do you want to consider that a "must fix" problem as well?
>> I think it's a pretty minor fix, but considering how late we are in the
>> cycle...

> Please give me something to add to the TODO.

Try "DONE" ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-05 05:37:01 Re: related to the 'pg_group' issue?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-05 05:16:06 Re: pg_group_name_index corrupt?