From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: new unicode table border styles for psql |
Date: | 2013-11-25 15:17:06 |
Message-ID: | 529369F2.7090103@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/25/2013 09:33 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Even if it is it's totally off topic. Please don't hijack email threads.
> Well, when I read that parsing a user setup is too complex, for me that
> calls for a solution that offers more power to the user without us
> having to write specialized code each time.
>
> I'm sorry, but I don't understand how off-topic or hijack applies here.
>
It just seems to me to be a very big stretch to go from the topic of
psql border styles to the topic of psql scripting support. Your use case
would surely be using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. By all means argue
for better scripting support in psql, but I would suggest your argument
would be better if the use case were something more important and
central to psql's purpose.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-11-25 15:26:55 | Re: new unicode table border styles for psql |
Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2013-11-25 14:33:03 | Re: new unicode table border styles for psql |