From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, alexsav23(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #8608: ECPG: sizeof() in EXEC SQL DECLARE SECTION |
Date: | 2013-11-24 14:59:40 |
Message-ID: | 5292145C.5000508@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
2013-11-24 12:55 keltezéssel, Michael Meskes írta:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 10:39:48PM +0000, alexsav23(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>> d:\>"c:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\9.3\bin\ecpg.exe"-o 1.c 1.pgc
>> 1.pgc: 4: ERROR: syntax error at or near "("
>> error deleting output file "1.c"
> And another patch to try. Please send me feedback.
I think it's needlessly narrows the scope of the problem.
Consider this code:
#include <stdio.h>
#define hide_size_of_var sizeof
int main(void) {
int a[hide_size_of_var(int)];
int i;
for (i = 0; i < hide_size_of_var(int); i++) {
a[i] = i*3;
printf("i: %d a[i]: %d\n", i, a[i]);
}
return 0;
}
It compiles just fine in a C compiler and runs from 0 to 3 as expected.
GCC 4.8.2 doesn't say anything about it with -Wall.
I think you should pass everything through as is inside the '[' and ']' and
let the C compiler fail if the code is not valid.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
>
> Michael
>
>
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-24 16:09:57 | Re: BUG #8611: ECPG: unclosed comment "/*" |
Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 2013-11-24 11:55:17 | Re: BUG #8608: ECPG: sizeof() in EXEC SQL DECLARE SECTION |