Re: Make uselocale protection more consistent

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tristan Partin <tristan(at)neon(dot)tech>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Make uselocale protection more consistent
Date: 2023-07-03 14:15:18
Message-ID: 5291edbd-1d80-4876-ca01-725156a08f55@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03.07.23 08:24, Thomas Munro wrote:
> I propose[1] that we get rid of HAVE_LOCALE_T completely and make
> "libc" provider support unconditional. It's standardised, and every
> target system has it, even Windows. But Windows doesn't have
> uselocale().
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA%2BhUKGL7CmmzeRhoirzjECmOdABVFTn8fo6gEOaFRF1Oxey6Hw%40mail.gmail.com#aef2f2274b28ff8a36f9b8a598e3cec0

Ok, it appears your patch is imminent, so let's wait for that and see if
this patch here is still required afterwards.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira 2023-07-03 14:16:00 Re: logicalrep_message_type throws an error
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2023-07-03 14:12:49 Re: pg_basebackup check vs Windows file path limits