From: | Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Mario Weilguni <roadrunner6(at)gmx(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Minor patch for the uuid-ossp extension |
Date: | 2013-11-23 14:11:22 |
Message-ID: | 5290B78A.7080100@ohmu.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
23.11.2013 14:12, Mario Weilguni kirjoitti:
> Am 22.11.2013 16:15, schrieb Tom Lane:
>> [ memo to self: never, ever accept another contrib module whose name
>> isn't a plain SQL identifier ]
>
> Well, in that case and since this is a rarely used extension (I guess
> so), maybe it would be the best to simply rename that extension to
> uuidossp (or whatever) and don't make any special treatment for it?
There are a couple of threads about issues with uuid-ossp (AIUI it's
abandonware at this point). If PostgreSQL had a proper PRNG with a
128-bit state it could just implement uuid_generate_v4() function in
core and most people could probably drop uuid-ossp.
I have a branch[1] which implements uuid_generate_v4 in core using
pg_lrand48, but since it only has 48 bits of state it's probably not an
acceptable replacement for uuid-ossp for now.
Is anyone working on a new PRNG for PostgreSQL at the moment?
/ Oskari
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-11-23 15:44:53 | Re: Building on S390 |
Previous Message | Rodolfo Campero | 2013-11-23 13:09:53 | Re: PL/Python: domain over array support |