From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Can we trust fsync? |
Date: | 2013-11-21 02:13:11 |
Message-ID: | 528D6C37.1090201@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/20/2013 03:45 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>
> I'm really concerned by this post on Linux's fsync and disk flush behaviour:
>
> http://milek.blogspot.com.au/2010/12/linux-osync-and-write-barriers.html
>
> and seeking opinions from folks here who've been deeply involved in
> write reliability work.
>
> The amount of change in write reliablity behaviour in Linux across
> kernel versions, file systems and storage abstraction layers is worrying
> - different results for LVM vs !LVM, md vs !md, ext3 vs other, etc.
>
> If this isn't something that's already been seen and dealt with then
> I'll see if I can take a look into it once the RLS work is dealt with.
>
I thought Greg did some testing on this a while back and determined
which versions were safe... (/me looks for post)
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Asit Mahato | 2013-11-21 02:14:19 | noob's query |
Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2013-11-21 02:11:55 | Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs |