| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: nested hstore patch |
| Date: | 2013-11-19 15:59:02 |
| Message-ID: | 528B8AC6.1070306@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/19/2013 10:51 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> I suggest we add another type, maybe jsobj, which has input and output
>> as standard
>> "JSON" but which is defined from the start to be equivalent of existing
>> object
>> and not "preservable source code" to such object.
> I think this was the consensus solution when this was last discussed,
> and I support it. There is similar space for a binary XML data type
> if someone feels like implementing it. I think the names that were
> proposed previously were something like jsonb and xmlb.
>
I think that's the consensus position on a strategy.
JSONB seems to be the current winner min the name stakes.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2013-11-19 15:59:31 | Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-11-19 15:58:22 | Re: Review: pre-commit triggers |