Re: additional json functionality

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: additional json functionality
Date: 2013-11-17 00:13:19
Message-ID: 52880A1F.6070803@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/16/2013 02:04 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On 11/16/2013 10:30 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> I still like JSONB best.
> To me it feels redundant, like binarytextbinary
>
> the binary representation of JSON is JavaScript(-like) Object, not
> "binary json"

JSONB is as close as we can get to "JSON", and it gives people the idea
that this is the successor type to JSON. So +1 from me as well on "JSONB".

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-11-17 00:29:16 Re: Improving avg performance for numeric
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2013-11-16 23:53:12 Re: Review:Patch: SSL: prefer server cipher order