Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal
Date: 2013-01-25 20:29:17
Message-ID: 5283.1359145757@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Oops, thanks. Here is the right paragraph, same issue:

> If successfully created, a named portal object lasts till the end of the
> current transaction, unless explicitly destroyed. An unnamed portal is
> destroyed at the end of the transaction, or as soon as the next Bind
> statement specifying the unnamed portal as destination is issued. (Note

What is the issue exactly? Seems clear and correct to me ... but then,
I think I wrote this text, a long time ago.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-01-25 20:29:58 Re: Enabling Checksums
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-01-25 20:26:57 Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal