Re: [PATCH] configure: add git describe output to PG_VERSION when building a git tree

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] configure: add git describe output to PG_VERSION when building a git tree
Date: 2013-11-05 15:45:10
Message-ID: 52791286.1050608@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 11/05/2013 10:32 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> All-in-all, I'm not super excited about this but I also wouldn't mind,
> so while not really a '+1', I'd say '+0'. Nice idea, if it isn't
> painful to deal with and maintain.
>
>

I doubt it's buying us anything worth having. What's more, it might get
in the road of some other gadget that would be worth having.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-11-05 15:51:01 Re: better atomics
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-11-05 15:39:49 Re: [PATCH] configure: add git describe output to PG_VERSION when building a git tree