| From: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months |
| Date: | 2017-05-29 04:26:36 |
| Message-ID: | 5273821e20ac677cdc0b4df5f9e711de@xs4all.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-05-29 00:17, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> On 28/05/17 19:01, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>
>> So running in cloud land now...so for no errors - will update.
>
> The framework ran 600 tests last night, and I see 3 'NOK' results, i.e
> 3 failed test runs (all scale 25 and 8 pgbench clients). Given the way
Could you also give the params for the successful runs?
Can you say anything about hardware? (My experience is that older,
slower, 'worse' hardware makes for more fails.)
Many thanks, by the way. I'm glad that it turns out I'm probably not
doing something uniquely stupid (although I'm not glad that there seems
to be a bug, and an elusive one at that)
Erik Rijkers
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2017-05-29 04:44:20 | Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-29 03:20:41 | pgsql: Code review focused on new node types added by partitioning supp |