Re: random() generates collisions too early

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Honza Horak <hhorak(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: random() generates collisions too early
Date: 2013-10-24 12:42:38
Message-ID: 526915BE.2040401@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 23.10.2013 16:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
>> Or perhaps it would be even better to move random() and setseed to a
>> separate table. They are somewhat different from the rest of the
>> functions listed in the table of Mathematical Functions, and it would be
>> nice to list them together; currently the round() functions fall between
>> them in the alphabetically ordered table. What do you think of the attached?
>
> +1, but (a) I think the tgroup has 3 cols not 2; (b) s/depends/depend/
> for grammar reaons.

Fixed and committed, thanks.

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-10-24 14:04:00 Re: random() generates collisions too early
Previous Message Haribabu kommi 2013-10-24 11:39:40 Re: BUG #8552: NEGATIVE_RETURNS in contrib/pageinspect/rawpage.c:83