From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Honza Horak <hhorak(at)redhat(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: random() generates collisions too early |
Date: | 2013-10-24 12:42:38 |
Message-ID: | 526915BE.2040401@vmware.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 23.10.2013 16:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
>> Or perhaps it would be even better to move random() and setseed to a
>> separate table. They are somewhat different from the rest of the
>> functions listed in the table of Mathematical Functions, and it would be
>> nice to list them together; currently the round() functions fall between
>> them in the alphabetically ordered table. What do you think of the attached?
>
> +1, but (a) I think the tgroup has 3 cols not 2; (b) s/depends/depend/
> for grammar reaons.
Fixed and committed, thanks.
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-10-24 14:04:00 | Re: random() generates collisions too early |
Previous Message | Haribabu kommi | 2013-10-24 11:39:40 | Re: BUG #8552: NEGATIVE_RETURNS in contrib/pageinspect/rawpage.c:83 |