Re: Commitfest II CLosed

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest II CLosed
Date: 2013-10-21 18:48:22
Message-ID: 526576F6.1070107@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/21/13 9:18 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I am not 100% sure, but what's the point of the CF if we're not actually
> reviewing patches that wouldn't get review without it? So I guess it's
> not starting the next one before we've finished - which we obviously
> haven't in this case - the last one.

The point is to get people to do some reviewing in the first place. If
people don't want to review certain things or are exhausted after a
month, extending the commitfest is not going to achieve much.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-10-21 18:50:54 Re: logical changeset generation v6.2
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2013-10-21 18:40:36 Re: Commitfest II CLosed