Re: Commitfest II CLosed

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Mike Blackwell <mike(dot)blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest II CLosed
Date: 2013-10-21 15:46:05
Message-ID: 52654C3D.3040504@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/21/2013 05:13 PM, Mike Blackwell wrote:
> Actually, I did call them out in the thread announcing the CF Wrap Up
> (http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAESHdJonURj3i9HR2w4e=ohep5Hx7sNqyyDSGYWeQqa+A3dfEg@mail.gmail.com)
>
>
> Looking back, it may have been better to post it as a separate thread,
> but I'm not confident that would have made much difference.
I was more thinking in lines of creating one thread per unreviewed
patch with patch title in Subject:, so that each could become its
own discussion

--
Hannu Krosing
PostgreSQL Consultant
Performance, Scalability and High Availability
2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ

>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________________
> *Mike Blackwell | Technical Analyst, Distribution Services/Rollout
> Management | RR Donnelley*
> 1750 Wallace Ave | St Charles, IL 60174-3401
> Office: 630.313.7818
> Mike(dot)Blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com <mailto:Mike(dot)Blackwell(at)rrd(dot)com>
> http://www.rrdonnelley.com <http://www.rrdonnelley.com/>
>
>
> <http://www.rrdonnelley.com/>
>
> *__*
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
> <mailto:hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On 10/21/2013 03:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >
> > I feel guilty to complain, while not actually volunteering to be a
> > commitfest manager myself, but I wish the commitfest manager
> would be
> > more aggressive in nagging, pinging and threatening people to review
> > stuff. If nothing else, always feel free to nag me :-). Josh tried
> > that with the infamous Slacker List, but that backfired. Rather than
> > posting a public list of shame, I think it would work better to send
> > short off-list nag emails, or chat via IM. Something like "Hey,
> you've
> > signed up to review this. Any progress?". Or "Hey, could you take a
> > look at X please? No-one else seems to care about it."
> Or maybe even nag publicly with "list of orphans" - hey people, do you
> *really* think that this patch is not needed ?
>
>
>
> --
> Hannu Krosing
> PostgreSQL Consultant
> Performance, Scalability and High Availability
> 2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> <mailto:pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-10-21 15:53:00 Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2013-10-21 15:26:47 Re: logical changeset generation v6.4