| From: | Stéphan BEUZE <stephan(dot)beuze(at)douane(dot)finances(dot)gouv(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ERROR : 'tuple concurrently updated' |
| Date: | 2013-10-18 10:24:27 |
| Message-ID: | 52610C5B.7030507@douane.finances.gouv.fr |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
You may find additional answers in my last email.
However, I'll try to adress some of your questions.
> a. Are there any new connections happening, how this table is getting populated?
Check my last email.
> b. How did you concluded that above sql statement leads to error,
> because this error doesn't seem to occur in path of above sql
> statement.
The errors appear when I added the second threads.
> c. Are there any other sql statements in connection where you see this error?
This is the only statement that generat this error.
> Can you explain a bit more about your scenario, so that this error
> can be reproduced easily.
Please check my last full detailed email.
> Some comments about SQL statements:
> a. table name provided as part of schema (mystat) is different
> from one used in sql statement(my_stat)
Sorry, for the typos
> b. definition of sequence mystat_sequence is missing, although it
> doesn't seem to be necessary, but if you can provide the definition
> you are using
> then it will be better.
The definition of the sequence is provided in my detailed email among
other things too.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-10-18 11:26:17 | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |
| Previous Message | Stéphan BEUZE | 2013-10-18 10:13:02 | Re: ERROR : 'tuple concurrently updated' |