Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date: 2018-01-17 20:37:34
Message-ID: 5260.1516221454@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Thanks for the review. Updated patch attached.

Looks OK to me. Would it be worth annotating the added regression test
case with a comment that this once caused EPQ-related planning problems?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-01-17 20:40:25 Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-01-17 20:31:22 Re: PostgreSQL crashes with SIGSEGV