Re: New PostgreSQL Sponsorship Criteria

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New PostgreSQL Sponsorship Criteria
Date: 2013-10-11 18:13:46
Message-ID: 52583FDA.1080903@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 10/11/2013 11:03 AM, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> "an organization that employs two major contributors with permission to contribute to PostgreSQL"
>
> I would like to add something with "on company time" or "as part of their organizational requirements" but that sentence may be enough in itself. The point is that the organization provides the major contributor(s) the time to do so

Well, the idea was to distinguish between contributors who are allowed
to spend 4 hours/week on PostgreSQL by their companies, and contributors
who spend more like 25hours/week of company time. We have both kinds,
and from a sponsorship perspective, they're not equally valuable.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2013-10-11 18:16:48 Re: New PostgreSQL Sponsorship Criteria
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2013-10-11 18:06:53 Re: New PostgreSQL Sponsorship Criteria