Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction

From: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Regina Obe <lr(at)pcorp(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Sandro Santilli <strk(at)kbt(dot)io>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date: 2023-05-17 23:59:48
Message-ID: 52553877-7966-e25f-6c74-a974a504250e@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/17/23 6:59 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-05-16 at 20:23 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> Other than that, and I took your suggestions almost verbatim. Patch
>> attached. Thank you!
>
> Attached new patch with a typo fix and a few other edits. I plan to
> commit soon.

I did a quicker read through this time. LGTM overall. I like what you
did with the explanations around sensitivity (now it makes sense).

Thanks,

Jonathan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message YANG Xudong 2023-05-18 00:53:08 Re: [PATCH] Add loongarch64 native spin lock.
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-05-17 23:38:32 Re: Introduce WAIT_EVENT_EXTENSION and WAIT_EVENT_BUFFER_PIN