From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 高健 <luckyjackgao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why there are no max_wal_receivers |
Date: | 2013-10-08 12:34:20 |
Message-ID: | 5253FBCC.8020203@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 10/07/2013 11:05 PM, 高健 wrote:
> Hello:
>
>
>
> Thank you all for kindly replying my question.
>
>
> I read the documentation about pg_basebackup.
>
>
> The description says:
>
> The server must also be configured with max_wal_senders set high enough
> to leave at least one session available for the backup.
>
> Dose it mean:
>
> If I am building a one master -- one slave environment, I need the
> max_wal_sender to be at least 2.
>
> But I think pg_basebackup just use the one sender process temporarily,
> Is that right?
Well actually it will use at least one and up to two connections, see
-Xs option
>
>
> Best Regards
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2013-10-08 12:49:39 | Re: [GENERAL] Urgent Help Required |
Previous Message | Michal TOMA | 2013-10-08 11:38:59 | Re: pg_xlog size growing untill it fills the partition |