Re: Why there are no max_wal_receivers

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: 高健 <luckyjackgao(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why there are no max_wal_receivers
Date: 2013-10-07 14:10:22
Message-ID: 5252C0CE.1060203@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/06/2013 09:53 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:02 PM, 高健 <luckyjackgao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hello :
>>
>>
>> I found that for PG9.2.4, there is parameter max_wal_senders,
>>
>> But there is no parameter of max_wal_receivers.
>>
>>
>
> max_wal_senders is the maximum number of WAL sender processes that a
> primary server can create in response to requests from the standby
> servers. One WAL sender process is created on the primary server for
> each standby which would running the corresponding WAL receiver. So
> there is one-to-one mapping between WAL senders and WAL receivers
> (standbys).

Just to add, pg_basebackup also counts against the total of receivers:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/interactive/app-pgbasebackup.html

>
> --
> Amit Langote
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ovid 2013-10-07 14:51:11 Altering parent table breaks child table defaults
Previous Message Michal TOMA 2013-10-07 14:05:31 Re: pg_xlog size growing untill it fills the partition