Re: Vacuum Cost Documentation?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum Cost Documentation?
Date: 2004-08-07 16:59:17
Message-ID: 525.1091897957@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Good that autovacuum didn't make it then, those people would have had a
> big surprise :-)

If autovacuum had made it, would you expect someone to have enabled it
by default? Without advance discussion?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-08-07 17:33:32 Re: PITR - recovery to a particular transaction
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-07 16:43:20 Re: [PATCHES] UNICODE characters above 0x10000