Re: deadlock while re-indexing table

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: deadlock while re-indexing table
Date: 2008-02-12 17:31:05
Message-ID: 524EA782-E500-43C4-94DF-D9CCF2678929@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On 12-Feb-08, at 10:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Dave Cramer wrote:
>>> reindex table user_profile;
>>> ERROR: deadlock detected
>>> DETAIL: Process 32450 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on relation
>>> 194689112 of database 163880909; blocked by process 31236.
>>> Process 31236 waits for AccessShareLock on relation 194689110 of
>>> database 163880909; blocked by process 32450.
>
>> I don't find this very surprising ... I would suggest using "reindex
>> index" for each index instead. I'm not sure if REINDEX TABLE is
>> supposed to be deadlock-free.
>
> It's not guaranteed to be so, but I'd think simple cases would be
> okay. What's that other process doing?
>
The other process is inserting into the user_profile table.

Dave
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-02-12 18:02:52 Re: deadlock while re-indexing table
Previous Message Mark Cave-Ayland 2008-02-12 17:09:54 Re: Query using cursors using 100% CPU