From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Creating Primary Key after CREATE TABLE: Is Sequence created? |
Date: | 2013-09-27 19:58:09 |
Message-ID: | 5245E351.3050501@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 9/27/2013 12:40 PM, mdr wrote:
> Is it possible to create a column of type SQL:2011 types (INTEGER or such)
> and then connect a SEQUENCE to it and make that column a PRIMARY KEY -
> without creating a column of type SERIAL?
yes, its just more work.
something like...
CREATE TABLE fred (id integer, val character varying(100))
PRIMARY KEY (id);
CREATE SEQUENCE fred_id_seq OWNED BY fred.id;
ALTER TABLE fred ALTER COLUMN id SET DEFAULT
nextval('fred_id_seq'::regclass);
nextval() and OWNED BY are both postgres extensions.
>
> It seems column of type SERIAL is specific to Postgres and will make my
> script Postgres dependent?
>
> Just in case I decide to go to MySQL. Most likely not, but just wanted to
> manage to SQL:2011.
MySQL uses some kind of nonstandard 'autoincrement' attribute rather
than SEQUENCE
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi | 2013-09-27 20:03:57 | Re: Building with MinGW issue |
Previous Message | Monosij | 2013-09-27 19:43:36 | Re: Trying to create DB / user to import some data |