From: | Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbondc(at)openmv(dot)com>, Postgres General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql) |
Date: | 2008-09-16 13:55:16 |
Message-ID: | 524596.45102.qm@web25802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-www |
> One big reason why nothing hasn't been done is that
> there is a decent
> 'low tech' obfuscation tactic already: remove
> select access from
> pg_proc to the user accounts in question and
> 'public'. This will
> essentially disable casual browsing of procedure code from
> user
> accounts.
Neat :-)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2008-09-16 14:03:15 | Re: drop index |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-16 13:51:29 | Re: DbLink Compilation on Solaris 10 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-09-16 14:27:25 | Re: Fwd: 8FA9-8F0A-2C0E : REMINDER from pgsql-general |
Previous Message | Jonathan Bond-Caron | 2008-09-16 13:39:03 | Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql) |