Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql)

From: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbondc(at)openmv(dot)com>, Postgres General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql)
Date: 2008-09-16 13:55:16
Message-ID: 524596.45102.qm@web25802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-www

> One big reason why nothing hasn't been done is that
> there is a decent
> 'low tech' obfuscation tactic already: remove
> select access from
> pg_proc to the user accounts in question and
> 'public'. This will
> essentially disable casual browsing of procedure code from
> user
> accounts.

Neat :-)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2008-09-16 14:03:15 Re: drop index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-16 13:51:29 Re: DbLink Compilation on Solaris 10

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-09-16 14:27:25 Re: Fwd: 8FA9-8F0A-2C0E : REMINDER from pgsql-general
Previous Message Jonathan Bond-Caron 2008-09-16 13:39:03 Re: Obfuscated stored procedures (was Re: Oracle and Postgresql)