Re: pg_upgrade 10.2

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Murthy Nunna <mnunna(at)fnal(dot)gov>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade 10.2
Date: 2018-06-12 23:50:43
Message-ID: 523a2043-c269-4bb0-6859-a73f3fc7ad41@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general pgsql-performance

On 06/12/2018 02:49 PM, Murthy Nunna wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> Port numbers are correct.
>
> I moved the position of -c (-p 5433 -P 5434 -c -r -v). Now it is NOT complaining about old cluster running. However, I am running into a different problem.
>
> New cluster database "ifb_prd_last" is not empty
> Failure, exiting
>
> Note: ifb_prd_last is not new cluster. It is actually old cluster.
>
> Is this possibly because in one of my earlier attempts where I shutdown old cluster and ran pg_upgrade with -c at the end of the command line. I think -c was ignored and my cluster has been upgraded in that attempt. Is that possible?

I don't so because it exited before it got the upgrading part.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry Sievers 2018-06-12 23:56:30 Re: pg_upgrade 10.2
Previous Message Murthy Nunna 2018-06-12 23:41:22 RE: pg_upgrade 10.2

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry Sievers 2018-06-12 23:56:30 Re: pg_upgrade 10.2
Previous Message Murthy Nunna 2018-06-12 23:41:22 RE: pg_upgrade 10.2

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry Sievers 2018-06-12 23:56:30 Re: pg_upgrade 10.2
Previous Message Murthy Nunna 2018-06-12 23:41:22 RE: pg_upgrade 10.2