From: | Julian <tempura(at)internode(dot)on(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Partitioning V schema |
Date: | 2013-09-21 04:29:56 |
Message-ID: | 523D20C4.7060608@internode.on.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 21/09/13 02:51, Gregory Haase wrote:
>
> I would look towards how PostGis handles the Tiger census data for
> guidance. It's a similar, massive data set.
>
> Greg Haase
>
I'm not sure why it wouldn't handle it fine?
The question is at what point would third party "imported" datasets,
required for local lookup require their own dedicated solution (database
and/or server)?
Especially when we are talking about a large amounts of data that come
with their own unique global identifiers. Something like ISO 3166, even
small, would do well with its own database - but not large enough to
require a dedicated server.
This is the question I put to the OP, I would be interested to know.
Regards,
Julian
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi | 2013-09-21 07:08:19 | Building with MinGW issue |
Previous Message | Jayadevan M | 2013-09-21 04:24:13 | Re: Postgres 9.3 Installation Problems Windows 7 64 Bit Pro |