Re: Partitioning V schema

From: Julian <tempura(at)internode(dot)on(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioning V schema
Date: 2013-09-21 04:29:56
Message-ID: 523D20C4.7060608@internode.on.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 21/09/13 02:51, Gregory Haase wrote:
>
> I would look towards how PostGis handles the Tiger census data for
> guidance. It's a similar, massive data set.
>
> Greg Haase
>
I'm not sure why it wouldn't handle it fine?
The question is at what point would third party "imported" datasets,
required for local lookup require their own dedicated solution (database
and/or server)?
Especially when we are talking about a large amounts of data that come
with their own unique global identifiers. Something like ISO 3166, even
small, would do well with its own database - but not large enough to
require a dedicated server.

This is the question I put to the OP, I would be interested to know.

Regards,
Julian

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Muhammad Bashir Al-Noimi 2013-09-21 07:08:19 Building with MinGW issue
Previous Message Jayadevan M 2013-09-21 04:24:13 Re: Postgres 9.3 Installation Problems Windows 7 64 Bit Pro