Re: "format" function documentation fix

From: rudolf <stu3(dot)1(at)eq(dot)cz>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "format" function documentation fix
Date: 2013-09-17 09:00:48
Message-ID: 52381A40.9080900@eq.cz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

(Please CC me the reply, since I'm not subscribed to the list.)

Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 14 September 2013 09:29, rudolf <stu3(dot)1(at)eq(dot)cz> wrote:
>> The last example from
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/functions-string.html#FUNCTIONS-STRING-FORMAT
>> - "examples using width fields and the - flag" seems to be incorrect, see
>> the attached patch.
>
> No, the example is correct. Referring to the documentation above that:
>
> If the width argument is negative, the result is left aligned (as
> if the - flag had been specified) ...
>
> This applies even if the "-" flag is also specified. So the last
> example is meant to illustrate that 2 minuses don't make a plus here.

That's very unusual, IMO. This behavior follows some SQL standard or is
it an invention of PostgreSQL?

Thanks,

r.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2013-09-17 10:41:15 Re: "format" function documentation fix
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2013-09-17 08:49:44 Re: "format" function documentation fix