From: | rudolf <stu3(dot)1(at)eq(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: "format" function documentation fix |
Date: | 2013-09-17 09:00:48 |
Message-ID: | 52381A40.9080900@eq.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
(Please CC me the reply, since I'm not subscribed to the list.)
Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 14 September 2013 09:29, rudolf <stu3(dot)1(at)eq(dot)cz> wrote:
>> The last example from
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/functions-string.html#FUNCTIONS-STRING-FORMAT
>> - "examples using width fields and the - flag" seems to be incorrect, see
>> the attached patch.
>
> No, the example is correct. Referring to the documentation above that:
>
> If the width argument is negative, the result is left aligned (as
> if the - flag had been specified) ...
>
> This applies even if the "-" flag is also specified. So the last
> example is meant to illustrate that 2 minuses don't make a plus here.
That's very unusual, IMO. This behavior follows some SQL standard or is
it an invention of PostgreSQL?
Thanks,
r.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2013-09-17 10:41:15 | Re: "format" function documentation fix |
Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2013-09-17 08:49:44 | Re: "format" function documentation fix |