On 9/10/2013 9:49 PM, James Sewell wrote:
>
> As an aside, is there any reason to use pg_largeobjects if I am
> storing data under 1GB which doesn't require random reads any more? My
> impression is no?
one good reason to use LO is so you can read the data like its a
file. me, I'd as soon use NFS or whatever for that, with a file path
in the database, but I understand there's scenarios where thats not
practical.
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast