Re: SQL statement over 500% slower with 9.2 compared with 9.1

From: Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SQL statement over 500% slower with 9.2 compared with 9.1
Date: 2013-09-04 06:49:35
Message-ID: 5226D7FF.7020000@usit.uio.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/28/2013 09:08 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
[..........]

>
> If you don't want to do any major rewriting, you could probably
> stick an OFFSET 0 into the outer EXISTS sub-select (and/or the
> inner one) to get something similar to the 9.1 plan.
>

Thank you for your help.

Using OFFSET 0 in

SELECT *
FROM FilmParticipation C
WHERE C.partType = 'cast'
AND C.filmId = D.filmId
AND C.personId = D.personId
OFFSET 0

give us a result similar to 9.1.

This SQL is used as an example in one of the database courses at the
University. I will send them this information and they can decide if
they want to rewrite the statement or use the OFFSET trick.

regards,
- --
Rafael Martinez Guerrero
Center for Information Technology
University of Oslo, Norway

PGP Public Key: http://folk.uio.no/rafael/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAlIm1/8ACgkQBhuKQurGihRAogCePl6G51w8dfYMruj+qSm4Vsjl
coMAn2sjyv6PcfsKhASC7ct0WI4YKRtJ
=FdeD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-09-04 08:10:41 Re: COPY TO and VACUUM
Previous Message Roberto Grandi 2013-09-04 06:15:08 Re: COPY TO and VACUUM