From: | "Michael A(dot) Peters" <mpeters(at)shastaherps(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump, shemas, backup strategy |
Date: | 2010-07-24 21:23:47 |
Message-ID: | 52255.68.189.86.17.1280006627.squirrel@secure.shastaherps.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Michael A. Peters wrote:
>> I run CentOS 5.x and I do not like to upgrade vendor supplied packages.
>> My
>> version of pg_dump is from postgresql-8.1.21-1.el5_5.1 - I'm assuming
>> the
>> 8.1.21 is the important part.
>>
>
> That's a bad policy with PostgreSQL. I guarantee you that the problems
> you will run into because you're on PostgreSQL 8.1 are far worse than
> any you might encounter because you've updated from RedHat's PostgreSQL
> to the RPM packages provided by the PostgreSQL packagers. There are
> hundreds of known limitations in 8.1 you will absolutely suffer from as
> you expand your deployment that have been fixed in later versions. Yes,
> you can run into a packaging problem after upgrading to the PostgreSQL
> provided 8.3 or 8.4 that doesn't exist with the 8.1 they ship. But
> that's a *possible* issue, compared to the *guaranteed* limitations that
> are removed by using a later version of the database.
>
> Also, take a look at
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_Release_Support_Policy
> 8.1 will be a frozen release no longer receiving bug fixes real soon now.
OK. I already maintain my own php RPMs because RHEL php is too old (I need
the DOMDocument stuff) so maybe I need to add Postgresql to that.
PHP is the only thing I currently have that links against postgresql anyway.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-07-24 22:08:01 | Re: pg_dump, shemas, backup strategy |
Previous Message | Michael A. Peters | 2010-07-24 21:15:41 | Re: pg_dump, shemas, backup strategy |