| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 2024-05-09 release announcement draft |
| Date: | 2024-05-07 03:09:24 |
| Message-ID: | 521b015b-d890-46bd-9db6-6111a002dba2@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/6/24 11:05 PM, David Rowley wrote:
> On Tue, 7 May 2024 at 14:58, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>>>> * Throw an error if an index is accessed while it is being reindexed.
>>>
>>
>> Based on this, I'd vote to just remove it from the release announcement.
>
> I'd prefer that over leaving the wording the way it is. Looking at
> the test case in [1], it does not seem like a very likely thing for
> people to hit. It basically requires someone to be telling lies about
> a function's immutability.
I opted for that; and it turned out the other fix was simple, so here's
an updated draft.
Jonathan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 20240509updaterelease.md | text/plain | 4.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2024-05-07 03:27:49 | Re: 2024-05-09 release announcement draft |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2024-05-07 03:05:18 | Re: 2024-05-09 release announcement draft |