| From: | Charles Sheridan <cesheri(at)swbell(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Luca Ferrari <fluca1978(at)infinito(dot)it> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CTAGS for PL/pgSQL ? |
| Date: | 2013-08-29 14:17:46 |
| Message-ID: | 521F580A.4020804@swbell.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On 13-08-29 9:00 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Uh, I think Vim can use etags, no? Isn't etags Exuberant Ctags? The
>> Exuberant Ctags's FAQ mentions Vim:
>>
> I was referring to the etags shipped with emacs, that even if does not
> support (explicitly) sql seems to work for a very simple test. I've
> done the same test using the etags (from ctags) and it works too, so
> now the important thing is to make vim using the tags file and see
> what is missing.
>
>
> Luca
>
>
Vim documentation states that ctags won't work w/ vim, and recommends
exuberant-ctags. If ctags does process PL/pgSQL, perhaps that output
could be added to the exuberant-ctags tags file, likely w/ some
processing. I've got exuberant-ctags on a cron, and I think that Vim
also calls it periodically during a Vim session, so I'd also cron ctags
for regular update to the same tags file. To avoid sync problems,
where exuberant-ctags overwrites the ctags content, I'd actually want to
call both tags programs from the a common exuberant-ctags wrapper.
Charles
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | walerina | 2013-08-30 08:55:04 | Re: Find Out a Way to Recover Data From Android Phone |
| Previous Message | Luca Ferrari | 2013-08-29 14:00:21 | Re: CTAGS for PL/pgSQL ? |