Re: Does larger i/o size make sense?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Does larger i/o size make sense?
Date: 2013-08-27 19:54:50
Message-ID: 521D040A.8060509@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Kevin,

> I think I've seen a handful of reports of performance differences
> with different BLCKSZ builds (perhaps not all on community lists).
> My recollection is that some people sifting through data in data
> warehouse environments see a performance benefit up to 32KB, but
> that tests of GiST index performance with different sizes showed
> better performance with smaller sizes down to around 2KB.

I believe that Greenplum currently uses 128K. There's a definite
benefit for the DW use-case.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-08-27 19:55:57 Re: pg_restore multiple --function options
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-08-27 19:46:39 Re: Does larger i/o size make sense?