| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Antonin Houska <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Backup throttling |
| Date: | 2013-08-27 06:05:58 |
| Message-ID: | 521C41C6.5090503@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/27/2013 01:56 AM, Antonin Houska wrote:
> However what you stress now is control of the (continuous) WAL stream
> and thus something that affects normal operation, rather than setup. I
> still think the pg_basebackup does not have to throttle the WAL stream,
> so this your request does not overlap with the current patch.
I totally agree; I was getting off topic for this thread, and it's not
relevant to the patch as it stands.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-08-27 06:34:22 | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Previous Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2013-08-27 06:04:44 | Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs |