From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_system_identifier() |
Date: | 2013-08-26 21:25:49 |
Message-ID: | 521BC7DD.8090001@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/26/2013 01:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> All the other variables are either already exposed, don't seem to be all
> that interesting or not necessary accurate for a running cluster.
>
> I'd vote for doing things piecemal here, otherwise it seems to be too
> likely that we never get anywhere.
Ok, that sounds like a vote to accept the pg_system_identifier patch, then.
Given that the one thing I'd like to do is add to the docs on that
patch, cautioning users that system_identifier doesn't mean what they
think it means.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2013-08-26 23:24:58 | Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2013-08-26 20:50:09 | Re: pg_system_identifier() |